Abdi H., Williams L. J. Principal component analysis. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics. 2010;2(4):433-59.

Acs Z. J., Anselin L., Varga A. Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge. Research Policy. 2002;31(7):1069-85.

Agrawal A., Henderson R. Putting patents in context: exploring knowledge transfer from MIT. Management Science. 2002;48(1):44-60.

Arza V., De Fuentes C., Dutrénit G., Vazquez C. Channels and benefits of interactions between public research organizations and industry: comparing country cases in Africa, Asia, and Latin America. Developing national systems of innovation: university-industry interactions in the global south. 2015:165-93.

Highlights of AUTM’s U.S. Licensing Activity Survey, FY2014. 2014.

AUTM. 2016.

Baldini N., Grimaldi R., Sobrero M. To patent or not to patent? A survey of Italian inventors on motivations, incentives, and obstacles to university patenting. Scientometrics. 2007;70(2):333-54.

Barbosa M. R., Lima J. P. R., Fernandes A. C. A interação universidades-empresas e o processo de inovação em Pernambuco: o caso da Engenharia Elétrica e o setor de eletricidade e gás. Ensaios FEE. 2016;37(3):769-800.

Bolfarine H., Bussab W. O. Elementos de amostragem. 2005.

Bramwell A., Wolfe D. A. Universities and regional economic development: The entrepreneurial University of Waterloo. Research Policy. 2008;37(8):1175-87.

Lei nº 10.973, de 2 de dezembro de 2004. Dispõe sobre incentivos à inovação e à pesquisa científica e tecnológica no ambiente produtivo e dá outras providências. 2004.

Breznitz S. M., Feldman M. P. The engaged university. The Journal of Technology Transfer. 2012;37(2):139-57.

Brito E. V., Fausto D. A. Critérios utilizados por universidades públicas para o abandono de patentes e de pedidos de patentes não licenciados. Revista iPecege. 2015;1(2):147-68.

Plano de ciência, tecnologia e inovação para o desenvolvimento sustentável do nordeste brasileiro. 2014.

Closs L., Ferreira G., Sampaio C., Perin M. Intervenientes na transferência de tecnologia universidade-empresa: o caso PUCRS. Revista de Administração Contemporânea. 2012;16(1):59-78.

Cohen W. M., Nelson R. R., Walsh J. P. Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science. 2002;48(1):1-23.

Cowan R., Zinovyeva N. University effects on regional innovation. Research Policy. 2013;42(3):788-800.

Czarnitzki D., Hussinger K., Schneider C. Commercializing academic research: the quality of faculty patenting. Industrial and Corporate Change. 2011;20(5):1403-37.

De Fuentes C., Dutrénit G. Best channels of academia–industry interaction for long-term benefit. Research Policy. 2012;41(9):1666-82.

Decter M., Bennett D., Leseure M. University to business technology transfer-UK and USA comparisons. Technovation. 2007;27(3):145-55.

Dias A. A., Porto G. S. Gestão de transferência de tecnologia na Inova Unicamp. Revista de Administração Contemporânea. 2013;17(3):263-84.

Fernandes A. C., Souza B. C., Silva A. S. Demanda e oferta de tecnologia e conhecimento em região periférica: a interação universidade-empresa no Nordeste Brasileiro. Em busca da inovação: interação universidade-empresa no Brasil. 2011.

Ferreira M. H. W. Análise da produção científica e tecnológica do programa de pós-graduação em ciências farmacêuticas da UFPE. 2015.

Foltz J. D., Barham B. L., Chavas J., Kim K. Efficiency and technological change at US research universities. Journal of Productivity Analysis. 2012;37(2):171-86.

Gallini N. T. The economics of patents: lessons from recent U.S. patent reform. The Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2002;16(2):131-54.

Galván R. G. Patentamiento universitario e innovación en México, país en desarrollo: teoría y política. Revista de la Educación Superior. 2017;46(184):77-96.

Gil A. C. Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa. 2008.

Göktepe D., Mahagaonkar P. What do scientists want: money or fame?. 2008.

Gullo L. M. G., Guerrante R. S. Maiores depositantes de pedidos de patentes no Brasil, com prioridade brasileira (publicados entre 1999 e 2003). 2006.

Haase H., Araujo E. C., Dias J. Inovações vistas pelas patentes: exigências frente às novas funções das universidade. Revista Brasileira de Inovação. 2005;4(2):329-62.

Hair Jr. J. F., Black W. C., Babin B. J., Anderson R. E., Tatham R. L. Análise multivariada de dados. 2009.

Henderson R., Jaffe A. B., Trajtenberg M. Universities as a source of commercial technology: a detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965-1988. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 1998;80(1):119-27.

Hora H. R. M., Monteiro G. T. R., Arica J. Confiabilidade em questionários para qualidade: um estudo com o coeficiente alfa de Cronbach. Produto & Produção. 2010;11(2):85-103.

Huszár S., Prónay S., Buzás N. Examining the differences between the motivations of traditional and entrepreneurial scientists. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship. 2016;5(25):1-22.

Jensen R., Thursby J. G., Thursby M. C. Disclosure and licensing of university inventions: ‘The best we can do with the s**t we get to work with’. International Journal of Industrial Organization. 2003;21(9):1271-300.

Jolliffe I. T. Principal component analysis.. 1986.

Jolliffe I. T. Principal component analysis. 2002.

Kaiser H. F. The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika. 1958;23(3):187-200.

Kalutkiewicz M. J., Ehman R. L. Patents as proxies: NIH hubs of innovation. Nature Biotechnology. 2014;32(6):536-7.

Leydesdorff L., Meyer M. The decline of university patenting and the end of the Bayh-Dole effect. Scientometrics. 2010;83(2):355-62.

Li D., Azoulay P., Sampat B. The applied value of public investments in biomedical research. Science. 2017;356(6333):78-81.

Lima J. P. R., Fernandes A. C. Demandas e ofertas tecnológicas em economias retardatárias: anotações a partir de dois segmentos econômicos no Nordeste brasileiro. Revista Brasileira de Inovação. 2009;8(2):303-40.

Liu Y., Tan L., Cheng Y. University Patent Licensing and Its Contribution to China’s National Innovation System.. Economic Impacts of Intellectual Property-Conditioned Government Incentives. 2016:259-77.

Mardia K. V., Kent J. T., Bibby J. M. Multivariate analysis. 1979.

Markman G. D., Phan P. H., Balkin D. B., Gianiodis P. T. Entrepreneurship and university-based technology transfer. Journal of Business Venturing. 2005;20(2):241-63.

Maroco J., Garcia-Marques T. Qual a fiabilidade do alfa de Cronbach? Questões antigas e soluções modernas?. Laboratório de Psicologia. 2006;4(1):65-90.

Mendes C. D. S., Gullo L. M. G., Guerrante R. D. S. Principais titulares de pedidos de patentes no Brasil, com prioridade brasileira: depositados no período de 2004 a 2008. 2011.

Mowery D. C., Nelson R. R., Sampat B. N., Ziedonis A. A. The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh-Dole act of 1980. Research Policy. 2001;30(1):99-119.

Mowery D. C., Sampat B. N., Ziedonis A. A. Learning to patent: institutional experience, learning, and the characteristics of US university patents after the Bayh-Dole Act, 1981-1992. Management Science. 2002;48(1):73-89.

Muscio A. What drives the university use of technology transfer offices? Evidence from Italy. The Journal of Technology Transfer. 2010;35(2):181-202.

Oliveira R. M. O. Proteção e comercialização da pesquisa acadêmica do Brasil: motivações e percepções dos inventores. 2011.

Patents, innovation and economic performance OECD conference proceedings. 2004.

Osano H. M. Universities and development of regional innovation ecosystems: case of Kenya. WTR. 2017;6:113-29.

Parente R., Petrone M., Cerrato D. Co-patenting between university and business companies: evidence from Italy. 2011.

Park W. G. International patent protection: 1960-2005. Research Policy. 2008;37(4):761-6.

Pavitt K. Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy. 1984;13(6):343-73.

Pinho M., Fernandes A. C. Relevance of university-industry links for firms from developing countries: exploring different surveys. Developing national systems of innovation: university-industry interactions in the global south. 2015.

Póvoa L. M. C. Patentes de universidades e institutos públicos de pesquisa e a transferência de tecnologia para as empresas no Brasil. 2008.

Póvoa L. M. C., Rapini M. S. Technology transfer from universities and public research institutes to firms in Brazil: what is transferred and how the transfer is made. Science & Public Policy. 2010;37(2):147-59.

Ragavan S. Patent and trade disparities in developing countries. 2012.

Saragossi S., Potterie B. P. What patent data reveal about universities: the case of Belgium. The Journal of Technology Transfer. 2003;28(1):47-51.

Sharma P., Tripathi R. C. Patent citation: a technique for measuring the knowledge flow of information and innovation. World Patent Information. 2017;51:31-42.

Siegel D. S., Veugelers R., Wright M. Technology transfer offices and commercialization of university intellectual property: performance and policy implications. Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 2007;23(4):640-60.

Siegel D. S., Waldman D., Link A. Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study. Research Policy. 2003;32(1):27-48.

Silva K. Patentes acadêmicas no Brasil: um novo panorama de contribuição das universidades na via PCT. 2014.

Tian Y. From publishing to patenting: survey construction of Swedish academics’ motivations. 2015.

Torkomian A. Panorama dos núcleos de inovação tecnológica no Brasil. Transferência de tecnologia: estratégias para a estruturação de núcleos de inovação tecnológica. 2009:21-37.

The role of intellectual property rights in technology transfer and economic growth: theory and evidence. 2006.

Van Gils M., Vissers G., Wit J. Selecting the right channel for knowledge transfer between industry and science: consider the R&D-activity. European Journal of Innovation Management. 2009;12(4):492-511.

Wang G., Guan J. The role of patenting activity for scientific research: a study of academic inventors from China’s nanotechnology. Journal of Informetrics. 2010;4(3):338-50.

Weckowska D. M. Learning in university technology transfer offices: transactions-focused and relations-focused approaches to commercialization of academic research. Technovation. 2015;41-42:62-74.

Wong P., Ho Y., Singh A. Towards an “entrepreneurial university” model to support knowledge-based economic development: the case of the National University of Singapore. World Development. 2007;35(6):941-58.

Zuniga P. The state of patenting at research institutions in developing countries: policy approaches and practices. 2011.