Gestão & Produção
https://www.gestaoeproducao.com/article/doi/10.1590/0104-530x4747-20
Gestão & Produção
Artigo Original

Multi-criteria assessment of potential regions for wind power generation in the State of Rio de Janeiro

Elias Rocha Gonçalves Júnior; Igor Cassiano Rangel; Allysson Rodrigues Teixeira Tavares; Elias Gomes Figueira Júnior; Milton Erthal Junior; Claudio Luiz Melo de Souza

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0104-530x4747-20 Gest. Prod., vol.27, n3, 4747, 2020
PDF
SciELO
Downloads: 0
Views: 830

Abstract

Abstract: Due to the current climatic conditions and concerns about the energy generation by renewable sources, wind energy becomes an alternative to meet the existing energy demand. This paper aims to analyze the most promising regions of the State of Rio de Janeiro for the implementation of wind farms for electricity generation. As an analysis tool, we intend to use the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), due to its practicality, to assist in the state’s wind power atlas regions evaluation, identifying generating farms installation feasibility based on logistical, technical and economic aspects. Three suitable regions for wind farms installation were evaluated according to the following criteria: potencial for generation, land cost, interconnection cost to the grid, implementing zones e terrain-landform logistics. It was found that, for the Serrana Region, it is indicated the installation of a wind farm that operates at 50 meters in height, because it only has enough potential for equipment with this height. In the Lakes Region, it is appropriate to use wind turbines of 75 meters in height, highlighting it as the most promising for this equipment height, besides having the best logistics capacity of the three regions. Because it has a greater potential area than the other, the North Region provides a greater total production, also taking into account its greater efficiency in the aerogenerators to 100 meters of height, considering this region as the most appropriate. It is worth highlighting that, in this region, there is potential for installation in all the heights presented, scrutinizing the results obtained.

Keywords

Renewable energy, Wind energy, Multiple-criteria decision analysis, Analytic hierarchy process, State of Rio de Janeiro

Referências

Akella A. K., Saini R. P., Sharma M. P. Social, economical and environmental impacts of renewable energy systems. Renewable Energy. 2009;34(2):390-6.

Ali Y., Butt M., Sabir M., Mumtaz U., Salman A. Selection of suitable site in Pakistan for wind power plant installation using analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Journal of Control and Decision. 2017;5(2):117-28.

Allen P., Varga L. Exploring possible energy futures for the UK: evolving power generation. Emergence. 2013;15(2):24-47.

Alves J. R. X., Alves J. M. Definição de localidade para instalação industrial com o apoio do método de análise hierárquica (AHP). Production Journal. 2015;25(1):13-26.

Amponsah N., Troldborg M., Kington B., Aalders I., Hough R. L. Greenhouse gas emissions from renewable energy sources: a review of life cycle considerations. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2014;39:461-75.

Araújo R. C. P. Análise da atitude dos turistas com relação ao desenvolvimento da energia eólica no litoral Cearense, Brasil. Turismo e Sociedade. 2014;7(2):308-29.

Azevedo J. P. M., Nascimento R. S., Schram I. B. Energia eólica e os impactos ambientais: um estudo de revisão. Revista UniVap. 2017;51:101-6.

Baban S. M. J., Parry T. Developing and applying a GIS-assisted approach to locating wind farms in the UK. Renewable Energy. 2001;24(1):59-71.

Baloch M. H., Kaloi G. S., Memon Z. A. Current scenario of the wind energy in Pakistan challenges and future perspectives: A case study. Energy Reports. 2016;2:201-10.

Barbosa Filho W. P., Azevedo A. C. S. O uso da análise hierárquica como auxílio na tomada de decisão de políticas públicas em energia eólica considerando aspectos de sustentabilidade.. 2014.

Briozo R., Musetti M. Método multicritério de tomada de decisão: aplicação ao caso da localização espacial de uma Unidade de Pronto Atendimento – UPA 24 h. Gestão & Produção. 2015;22(4):805-19.

Costa G. B., Lyra R. F. F. Análise dos padrões de vento no estado de Alagoas. Revista Brasileira de Meteorologia. 2012;27(1):31-8.

Costa H. G. Auxílio multicritério à decisão: método AHP.. 2006.

Dalmaz A., Passos J. C., Colle S. Energia eólica para geração de eletricidade e a importância da previsão. Revista ABCM –Engenharia. 2008;13(1):27-32.

Davidsson S., Höök M., Wall G. A review of life cycle assessments on wind energy systems. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 2012;17(6):729-42.

Dong Q., Cooper O. An orders-of-magnitude AHP supply chain risk assessment framework. International Journal of Production Economics. 2016;182:144-56.

Dutra R. M., Szklo A. S. Incentive policies for promoting wind power production in Brazil: scenarios for the Alternative Energy Sources Incentive Program (PROINFA) under the New Brazilian electric power sector regulation. Renewable Energy. 2008;33(1):65-76.

Forman E. H., Selly M. A. Decision by objectives: How to convince others that you are right.. 2002.

Gartner I. R., Casarotto Filho N., Kopittke B. H. Um sistema multicriterial de apoio à análise de projetos em bancos de desenvolvimento. Revista Produto & Produção. 1998;2(3):75-86.

Global Wind Report 2016 – Annual market update. 2016.

Gomes C. F. S., Costa H. G., Barros A. P. Sensibility analysis of MCDA using prospective in Brazilian energy sector. Journal of Modelling in Management. 2017;12(3).

Grassi S., Chokani N., Abhari R. S. Large scale technical and economical assessment of wind energy potential with a GIS tool: case study Iowa. Energy Policy. 2012;45:73-85.

Greco S., Ehrgott M., Figueira J. Multiple criteria decision analysis.. 2016.

Grubb M. J., Meyer N. I. Wind energy: resources, systems and regional strategies.. Renewable energy: sources for fuels and electricity.. 1993.

Holder R. D. Some comments on the analytic hierarchy process. The Journal of the Operational Research Society. 1990;41(11):1073-6.

Janke J. R. Multicriteria GIS modeling of wind and solar farms in Colorado. Renewable Energy. 2010;35(10):2228-34.

Jong P., Sánchez A. S., Esquerre K., Kalid R. A., Torres E. A. Solar and wind energy production in relation to the electricity load curve and hydroelectricity in the northeast region of Brazil. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2013;23:526-35.

Kaldellis J. K., Kapsali M., Kaldelli E., Katsanou E. Comparing recent views of public attitude on wind energy, photovoltaic and small hydro applications. Renewable Energy. 2013;52:197-208.

Ke G. Y., Li K., Hipel K. W. An integrated multiple criteria preference ranking approach to the Canadian west coast port congestion conflict. Expert Systems with Applications. 2012;39(10):9181-90.

Latinopoulos D., Kechagia K. A GIS-based multi-criteria evaluation for wind farm site selection. a regional scale application in Greece. Renewable Energy. 2015;78:550-60.

Macharis C., Springael J., De Brucker K., Verbeke A. Promethee and AHP: the design of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis: strengthening promethee with ideas of AHP. European Journal of Operational Research. 2004;153(2):307-17.

Madlener R., Antunes C. H., Dias L. C. Assessing the performance of biogas plants with multi-criteria and data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research. 2009;197(3):1084-94.

Martins F. R., Guarnieri R. A., Pereira E. B. O aproveitamento da energia eólica. Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Física. 2008;30(1):1-13.

McMichael A. J., Powles J. W., Butler C. D., Uauy R. Food, livestock production, energy, climate change, and health. Lancet. 2007;370(9594):1253-63.

Pazheri F. R., Othman M. F., Malik N. H. A review on global renewable electricity scenario. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2014;31:835-45.

Pereira M. G., Camacho C. F., Freitas M. A. V., Silva N. F. The renewable energy market in Brazil: current status and potential. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2012;16(6):3786-802.

Pinto L. I. C., Martins F. R., Pereira E. B. O mercado brasileiro da energia eólica, impactos sociais e ambientais. Revista Ambiente & Água. 2017;12(6):1082-100.

Pohekar S., Ramachandran M. Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning: a review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2004;8(4):365-81.

Central geradora Eólica Gargaú. 2013.

Reiche D., Bechberger M. Policy differences in the promotion of renewable energies in the EU member states. Energy Policy. 2004;32(7):843-9.

Atlas eólico do estado do Rio de Janeiro.. 2002.

Valor da terra nua.. 2017.

Rosa C. S., Gonçalves Júnior E. R., Souza C. L. M., Erthal Junior M. Analysis of the acumulum and disposal method of assets in public organs. Revista Produção e Desenvolvimento. 2018;4(2):60-75.

Saaty T. L. How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research. 1990;48(1):9-26.

Saaty T. L. Método de análise hierárquica.. 1991.

Shinde D. D., Prasad R. Application of AHP for ranking of total productive maintenance pillars. Wireless Personal Communications. 2017;100:449-62.

Silva D. M. R. Aplicação do método AHP para avaliação de projetos industriais. 2007.

Silva R. C., Marchi Neto I., Seifert S. S. Electricity supply security and the future role of renewable energy sources in Brazil. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2016;59:328-41.

Simas M., Pacca S. Energia eólica, geração de empregos e desenvolvimento sustentável. Estudos Avançados. 2013;27(77):99-115.

Solangi Y. A., Tan Q., Khan M. W. A., Mirjat N. H., Ahmed I. The selection of wind power project location in the southeastern corridor of Pakistan: a factor analysis, AHP, and Fuzzy-TOPSIS application. Energies. 2018;11(8):1940.

Souza L. P., Gomes C. F. S., Barros A. P. Implementation of new Hybrid AHP-TOPSIS-2N method in sorting and prioritizing of an it CAPEX project portfolio. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making. 2018;17(4):977-1005.

Sun H., Wang S., Hao X. An Improved Analytic Hierarchy Process Method for the evaluation of agricultural water management in irrigation districts of north China. Agricultural Water Management. 2017;179(1):324-37.

Vargas R. Utilizando a Programação Multicritério (AHP) para selecionar e priorizar projetos na gestão de portfólio. 2010.

Watson J. J. W., Hudson M. D. Regional scale wind farm and solar farm suitability assessment using GIS-assisted multi-criteria evaluation. Landscape and Urban Planning. 2015;138:20-31.

Wolsink M. Wind power and the NIMBY-myth: institutional capacity and the limited significance of public support. Renewable Energy. 2000;21(1):49-64.

Yunna W., Geng S. Multi-criteria decision making on selection of solar–wind hybrid power station location: A case of China. Energy Conversion and Management. 2014;81:527-33.

Zahir S. Clusters in group: decision making in the vector space formulation of the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research. 1999;112(3):620-34.

Żak J., Galińska B. Multiple criteria evaluation of suppliers in different industries-comparative analysis of three case studies. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. 2018;572:121-55.

5f7b57690e8825a25b67ca72 gp Articles
1806-9649 (Eletrônico) 0104-530X (Impresso)
Gest. Prod. ©2024 Todos os direitos reservados.

Gest. Prod.

Share this page
Page Sections