Gestão & Produção
https://www.gestaoeproducao.com/article/doi/10.1590/0104-530x3014-19
Gestão & Produção
Original Article

Applicability of Performance Prism in SMEs: a multiple case study

Aderência do Performance Prism em MPE’s: um estudo de casos múltiplos

Elizandra Severgnini; Edwin V. Cardoza Galdamez; Reinaldo Rodrigues Camacho

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0104-530x3014-19 Gest. Prod., vol.26, n4, p.0, 2019
Downloads: 0
Views: 1608

Abstract

Abstract In the performance assessment models literature, is rather rare research that discusses the Performance Prism Framework, specifically in using it as management tool and in checking its validity as driver strategy instrument. There are also few studies on the applicability related to the implementation, use and analysis of the Performance Prism Framework in micro and small businesses. In this sense, this article has as main objective to propose (i) a bibliometric study of the Performance Prism Framework; and (ii) to develop a multiple case study of micro and small business. To meet the first goal, we used a bibliometric desk research method in the major databases, such as ISI Web of Knowledge, EBSCO and Proquest, which generated 81 articles. From them, we analyzed specifically few studies. To achieve the second goal, a multiple case study method with five micro and small businesses (e.g., sports segments, drugstore, clothing, department store and an apparel faction) was held. The findings confirmed the five dimensions of the Performance Prism Framework, called: (1) Stakeholders Satisfaction; (2) Contribution of Stakeholders; (3) Strategies; (4) Processes; and (5) Capabilities. In addition, we extend previous literature and proposed another dimension called (6) Performance Dynamic. The results also showed that the Capabilities is strongly seen as training employees, the Performance Dynamics are fundamentally weighted as sales amount, not as profit and the Contribution of Stakeholders is hardly evident.

Keywords

Small and medium enterprise, Performance measurement system, Performance Prism

Resumo

Resumo Na literatura sobre os modelos de avaliação de desempenho organizacional, são um tanto raras as pesquisa sobre o Performance Prism (PP), especialmente quanto ao seu uso como ferramenta de gestão e sua validade como instrumento direcionador da estratégia. Também são escassos os estudos sobre a aplicabilidade das pesquisas relacionadas à implementação, análise, uso e até mesmo manutenção do PP em micro e pequenas empresas. Com base nesse gap, este estudo tem por objetivo principal realizar i) um estudo bibliométrico do PP; ii) desenvolver estudos de casos múltiplos de micro e pequenas empresas quanto à observação e adequação das organizações ao modelo. Para atender o primeiro objetivo, uma pesquisa bibliométrica tipo desk research foi realizada nas principais bases de dados do ISI Web of Knowledge, EBSCO, e Proquest. A pesquisa gerou uma base de 81 artigos, sendo que alguns estudos se encaixaram no escopo desta pesquisa . Para atingir o segundo objetivo, um estudo de caso múltiplo com cinco micro e pequenas empresas (nos segmentos de esportes, farmácias, confecções, loja de departamentos e uma facção) foi realizado. Os achados da pesquisa mostraram as cinco facetas do PP, denominadas: 1) Satisfação dos Stakeholders; 2) Contribuição dos Stakeholders; 3) Estratégias; 4) Processos; e 5) Capacidades. Além disso, os achados apresentaram uma nova dimensão denominada de 6) Desempenho. Os resultados também demonstraram que o quesito de Capacidades é fortemente visto como treinamento de colaboradores, que a Dinâmica de Desempenho é fundamentalmente ponderada como volume de vendas e não como lucro e que a Contribuição dos Stakeholders para o negócio é pouco evidenciada.

Palavras-chave

MPE’s, Medição de desempenho, Performance Prism

Referencias

Adams C., Neely A. The performance prism to boost M&A success. Measuring Business Excellence. 2000;4(3):19-23.

Baines T. S., Lightfoot H. W., Evans S., Neely A., Greenough R., Peppard J., Roy R., Shehab E., Braganza A., Tiwari A., Alcock J. R., Angus J. P., Bastl M., Cousens A., Irving P., Johnson M., Kingston J., Lockett H., Martinez V., Michele P., Tranfield D., Walton I. M., Wilson H. State-of-the-art in product-service systems. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part B, Journal of Engineering Manufacture. 2007;221(10):1543-52.

Basso L. F. C., Pace E. S. U. Uma análise crítica da direção da causalidade no Balanced Scorecard. Revista de Administração de Empresas. 2003;2(1):1-21.

Bititci U. S., Carrie A. S., Turner T. J., Lutz S. Integrated performance measurement systems: implementation case studies. Strategic management of the manufacturing value chain. 1998:177-86.

Bourne M., Mills J., Wilcox M., Neely A., Platts K. Designing, implementing and updating performance measurement systems. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. 2000;20(7):754-71.

Bourne M., Neely A., Platts K., Mills J. The success and failure of performance measurement initiatives: perceptions of participating managers. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. 2002;22(11):1288-310.

Braz R. G. F., Scavarda L. F., Martins R. A. Reviewing and improving performance measurement systems: an action research. International Journal of Production Economics. 2011;133(2):751-60.

Chennell A., Dransfield S., Field J., Fisher N., Saunders I., Shaw D. OPM: a system for organisational performance measurement. 2000.

Chillida J. J. C. Performance Prism, a new approach to corporate social responsibility. 2009.

Choong K. K. Understanding the features of performance measurement system: a literature review. Measuring Business Excellence. 2013;17(4):102-21.

Cocca P., Alberti M. A framework to assess performance measurement systems in SMEs. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. 2010;59(2):186-200.

Cross K. F., Lynch R. L. Managing the corporate warriors. Quality Progress. 1990;23(4):54-9.

Curtis S, Gesler W, Smith G, Washburn S. Approaches to sampling and case selection in qualitative research: examples in the geography of health. Social Science & Medicine. 2000;50(7-8):1001-14.

Dixon J. R., Nanni A. J., Vollmann T. E. The new performance challenge: measuring operations for world class competition. 1990.

Faro M. C. S. C., Silva R. N. S. D. A natureza da pesquisa em contabilidade gerencial–análise bibliométrica de 1997 a 2007 nos principais periódicos internacionais. 2008.

Garengo P., Biazzo S., Bititci U. S. Performance measurement systems in SMEs: a review for a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews. 2005;7(1):25-47.

Gosselin M. An empirical study of performance measurement in manufacturing firms. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. 2005;54(5-6):419-37.

Govindarajan V. Appropriateness of accounting data in performance evaluation: an empirical examination of environmental uncertainty as an intervening variable. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 1984;9(2):125-35.

Grzebieluckas C., Campos L. M. D. S., Marinho S. V., Selig P. M. O perfil da produção acadêmica em Contabilidade e Custos Ambientais no período de 1996 a 2007: um estudo bibliométrico. 2008.

Hopwood A. G. An empirical study of the role of accounting data in performance evaluation. Journal of Accounting Research. 1972;10:156-82.

Hudson M., Smart A., Bourne M. Theory and practice in SME performance measurement systems. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. 2001;21(8):1096-115.

Kaplan R. S., Norton D. P. The balanced scorecard: measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review. 1992;70(1):71-9.

Kaplan R. S., Norton D. P. Transforming the balanced scorecard from performance measurement to strategic management: part I. Accounting Horizons. 2001;15(1):87-104.

Landivar C. G. P., Sproesser R. L., dos Santos A. B. Modelos de avaliação de desempenho para terminais intermodais de transbordo de grãos. Revista Gepec. 2013;17(1):116-31.

Lebas M. J. Performance measurement and Performance management. International Journal of Production Economics. 1995;41(1-3):23-35.

Liu J., Love P. E., Smith J., Regan M., Palaneeswaran E. Review of performance measurement: implications for public–private partnerships. Built Environment Project and Asset Management. 2015;5(1):35-51.

Melnyk S. A., Bititci U., Platts K., Tobias J., Andersen B. Is performance measurement and management fit for the future?. Management Accounting Research. 2014;25(2):173-86.

Muylaert C. J., Sarubbi Jr. V., Gallo P. R., Rolim No. M. L. Entrevistas narrativas: um importante recurso em pesquisa qualitativa. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP. 2014;48(2):184-9.

Najmi M., Etebari M., Emami S. Framework to review performance prism. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. 2012;32(10):1124-46.

Najmi M., Rigas J., Fan I.-S. A framework to review performance measurement systems. Business Process Management Journal. 2005;11(2):109-22.

Neely A. The performance measurement revolution: why now and what next?. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. 1999;19(2):205-28.

Neely A. Business performance measurement: unifying theories and integrating practice. 2007.

Neely A. D., Adams C., Kennerley M. The Performance Prism: the scorecard for measuring and managing stakeholder relationships. 2002.

Neely A., Adams C., Crowe P. The performance prism in practice. Measuring Business Excellence. 2001;5(2):6-13.

Neely A., Gregory M., Platts K. Performance measurement system design: a literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. 1995;25(12):1228-63.

Neely A., Gregory M., Platts K. Performance measurement system design: a literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. 2005;25(12):1228-63.

Norreklit H. The balance on the balanced scorecard a critical analysis of some of its assumptions. Management Accounting Research. 2000;11(1):65-88.

O’Boyle I., Hassan D. Organizational performance management: examining the practical utility of the performance prism. Organization Development Journal. 2013;31(3):51-8.

Pun K. F., White A. S. A performance measurement paradigm for integrating strategy formulation: a review of systems and frameworks. International Journal of Management Reviews. 2005;7(1):49-71.

Reame Jr. E., Reame G. H. A aplicabilidade do balanced scorecard e do desempenho prism como modelos de sistemas de medição de desempenho organizacional. Interface Tecnológica. 2007;4(1):43-50.

Rompho N. Why the balanced scorecard fails in SMEs: a case study. International Journal of Business and Management. 2011;6(11):39-46.

Santos R. N. Produção científica: por que medir? O que medir?. Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação. 2004;1(1):22-38.

Seawright J., Gerring J. Case selection techniques in case study research a menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Political Research Quarterly. 2008;61(2):294-308.

Severgnini E., Galdamez E., Moraes R. Satisfaction and contribution of stakeholders model from Performance Prism. Brazilian Business Review. 2017;15(2):120-34.

Silva A. B., Godoi C. K., Bandeira-De-Mello R. Pesquisa qualitativa em estudos organizacionais: paradigmas, estratégias e métodos. 2010.

Silva R. N. S., Souza-Coelho P. S. Um estudo exploratório sobre as metodologias empregadas em pesquisas na área de contabilidade no EnANPAD. Revista Contemporânea de Contabilidade. 2007;4(8):139-59.

Silva Jr. S. D., Luciano E. M., Testa M. G. Contribuições do Modelo de Medição de Desempenho Organizacional da Desempenho Prism ao Balanced Scorecard: um estudo sob a perspectiva dos stakeholders. Revista de Ciências da Administração. 2013;1(1):136-53.

Silvi R., Bartolini M., Raffoni A., Visani F. The practice of strategic performance measurement systems: models, drivers and information effectiveness. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. 2015;64(2):194-227.

Singh K., Weligamage S. Thinking towards stakeholder satisfaction in higher education: an application of performance prism. 2010.

Smulowitz S. Evidence for the performance prism in higher education. Measuring Business Excellence. 2015;19(1):70-80.

Stake RE. The case study method in social inquiry. Educational Researcher. 1978;7(2):5-8.

Tangen S. Performance measurement: from philosophy to practice. International Journal of Productivity and Desempenho Management. 2004;53(8):726-37.

Taticchi P., Balachandran K. R., Botarelli M., Cagnazzo L. Performance measurement management for small and medium enterprises: an integrated approach. Journal of Applied Management Accounting Research. 2008;6(2):57-71.

Taticchi P., Tonelli F., Cagnazzo L. Desempenho measurement and management: a literature review and a research agenda. Measuring Business Excellence. 2010;14(1):4-18.

Taylor A., Taylor M. Factors influencing effective implementation of performance measurement systems in small and medium-sized enterprises and large firms: a perspective from Contingency Theory. International Journal of Production Research. 2014;52(3):847-66.

5dde7c330e882581697b23c8 gp Articles
Links & Downloads
1806-9649 (Electrónico) 0104-530X (Impreso)
Gest. Prod. ©2025 Todos los derechos reservados.

Gest. Prod.

Share this page
Page Sections