Gestão & Produção
https://www.gestaoeproducao.com/article/doi/10.1590/0104-530x2094-19
Gestão & Produção
Artigo Original

Avaliação da maturidade do processo de S&OP em uma empresa de material de escrita: um estudo de caso

Evaluation of the maturity of the S&OP process for a written materials company: a case study

Gustavo Bagni; Josadak Astorino Marçola

Downloads: 0
Views: 982

Resumo

Resumo O objetivo desta pesquisa foi avaliar o estágio de maturidade do processo de S&OP da empresa objeto de estudo, identificar as principais deficiências por categoria avaliada e propor ações para sua melhoria. Para tanto, utilizaram-se três modelos, sendo dois modelos qualitativos e um modelo quantitativo. A pesquisa apresentou resultados divergentes entre a classificação oriunda dos modelos qualitativos e quantitativo, especialmente pelo fato de as métricas calculadas serem genéricas, não incorporando fatores como tipo de mercado consumidor, número de clientes e características de seus produtos e processos. Para a métrica acuracidade da previsão de vendas, é proposta a realização de uma média ponderada entre a acuracidade de cada família de produtos, sendo os pesos definidos por meio de uma classificação ABC baseada no faturamento das famílias. Do ponto de vista prático, notou-se que a principal dificuldade do processo de S&OP na empresa estudada reside na interface entre demanda e suprimentos, especialmente pelo fato de a companhia possuir uma estrutura organizacional do tipo funcional orientada ao atendimento da demanda. O fortalecimento dessa integração é a finalidade maior da atuação de um processo de S&OP na empresa, para minimizar conflitos funcionais e melhorar o desempenho da companhia.

Palavras-chave

S&OP, Modelo de maturidade, Gestão da demanda, Gestão de operações, Gestão por processo

Abstract

Abstract This paper aims to evaluate the maturity stage of S&OP process in a written materials company to identify main deficiencies of this process and to suggest actions to its evolution. Three models were selected to do this task: two qualitative models, proposed by and a quantitative one. There were significantly differences between results from the quantitative and the qualitative models, especially because the quantitative model used generic reference value for the metrics, without considering industry in which the company is located, the number of clients as well as the characteristics of its products and processes. For the demand planning accuracy metric, it is proposed a method using an average weighted of product families’ accuracy, defining the weights by an ABC classification based on families’ revenues. On the practical field, the main difficult in S&OP process analyzed was the interface between demand and supply, especially because the company has a functional structure focused on meeting demand. The difficult of this integration is, in fact, the main purpose of S&OP. Therefore, the company expects to reduce the conflicts in this interface in the coming years.

Keywords

S&OP, Maturity model, Sales management, Operations management, Process management

Referências

Brown J. R., Ozgur C. O. Priority class scheduling: production scheduling for multi-objective environments. Production Planning and Control. 1997;8(8):762-70.

Cacere L., Barret J., Mooraj H. Sales and Operations Planning: transformation from tradition: industry value chain strategies. 2009.

Chen L. T. Optimal dynamic policies for integrated production and marketing planning in business-to-business marketplaces. International Journal of Production Economics. 2014;153(1):46-53.

Chou Y. C., Cheng C. T., Yang F. C., Liang Y. Y. Evaluating alternative capacity strategies in semiconductor manufacturing under certain demand and price scenarios. International Journal of Production Economics. 2007;105(2):591-606.

Collin J., Lorenzin D. Plan for supply chain agility at Nokia: lessons from the mobile infrastructure industry. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management. 2006;36(6):418-30.

Corrêa H. L. Gestão de rede de suprimentos: integrando cadeias de suprimentos no mundo globalizado. 2010.

Cox J. F., Blackstone J. H. APICS dictionary. 2005.

Crum C., Tearnan R. Role of the S&OP coordinator in the integrated reconciliation step of the S&OP process. 2014.

Dougherty J., Gray C. Sales & Operations Planning: best practices: lessons learned. 2006.

Esper T. L., Elinger A. E., Stank T. P., Flint D. J., Moon M. Demand and supply integration: a conceptual framework of value creation through knowledge management. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 2009;28:5-18.

Feng Y., D’Amours S. S., Beauregard R. The value of sales and operations planning in oriented strand board industry with make-to-order manufacturing system: cross functional integration under deterministic demand and spot market resource. International Journal of Production Economics. 2008;105(1):189-209.

Galeazzo A., Furlan A., Vinelli A. Understanding environmental-operations integration: the case of pollution prevention projects. International Journal of Production Economics. 2014;153(1):149-60.

Geng N., Jiang Z. A review of strategic capacity planning for the semiconductor manufacturing industry. International Journal of Production Research. 2009;47(13):3639-55.

Grimson J. A., Pyke D. F. Sales and operations planning: an exploratory study and framework. International Journal of Logistics Management. 2007;18(3):322-46.

Kallunki J.-P., Laitinen E. K., Silvola H. Impact of enterprise resource planning system on management control systems and firm performance. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems. 2011;12(1):20-39.

Kathuria R., Joshi M. P., Porth S. J. Organizational alignment and performance: past, present and future. Management Decision. 2007;45(3):503-17.

Kozlenkova I. V., Hult G. T. M., Lund D. J., Mena J. A., Kekec P. The role of marketing channels in Supply Chain Management. Journal of Retailing. 2015;91(4):586-609.

Kruse G. New wine in old bottles?. IEE Manufacturing Enginneer. 2004;83(3):48.

Lapide L. Sales & operations planning part I: the process. Journal of Business Forecasting. 2004;23(4):18-20.

Lapide L. Sales & operations planning part III: a diagnostic model. Journal of Business Forecasting. 2005;24(1):13-6.

Lawrence P. R., Lorsch J. W. Organization and environment: managing differentiation and integration. 1967.

Leonard-Barton D. A dual methodology for case studies: synergistic use of longitudinal single site with replicated multiple sites. Organization Science. 1990;1(3):248-66.

Lim L. L., Apan G., Penz B. Reconciling sales and operations management with distant suppliers in automotive industry: a simulation approach. International Journal of Production Economics. 2014;151(1):20-36.

Malhotra M. K., Sharma S. Spanning the continuum between marketing and operations. Journal of Operations Management. 2002;20(3):209-19.

Marques A., Lacerda D. P., Camargo L. F. R., Teixeira R. Exploring the relationship between marketing and operations: neural network analysis of marketing decision impacts on delivery performance. International Journal of Production Economics. 2014;153(1):178-90.

Martínez-Costa C., Mas-Machuca M., Benedito E., Corominas A. A review of mathematical programming models for strategic capacity planning in manufacturing. International Journal of Production Economics. 2014;153(1):66-85.

Mollenkopf D., Frankel R., Russo I. Creating value through returns management: exploring the marketing-operations interface. Journal of Operations Management. 2011;29(5):391-403.

Olhager J., Selldin E. Manufacturing planning and control approaches: market alignment and performance. International Journal of Production Research. 2007;45(6):1469-84.

Oliva R., Watson N. Managing functional bias in organizational forecast: a case study in consensus forecast in supply chain management. Production and Operations Management. 2009;18(2):138-51.

Palmatier G. E., Crum C. Enterrise sales and operations planning. 2003.

Rexhausen D., Pibernik R., Kaiser G. Customer-facing supply chain practices: the impact of demand and distribution management on supply chain success. Journal of Operations Management. 2012;40(4):269-81.

Sawhney R., Piper C. Value creating through enriched marketing-operations interfaces: an empirical study in the printed circuit board industry. Journal of Operations Management. 2002;20(3):259-72.

Shapiro B. P. Can marketing and manufacturing co-exist?. Harvard Business Review. 1977;55(5):104-14.

Sheldon D. H. World Class Sales and Operation Planning: a guide to successful implementation and robust execution. 2006.

Singh M. K. What makes a winning S&OP program. Supply Chain Management Review. 2010;14(3):22-7.

Singhal J., Singhal K. Holt, Modigliani, Muth, and Simon’s work and its role in the renaissance and evolution of operations management. Journal of Operations Management. 2007;25(2):300-9.

Slone R. E. Leading a supply chain turnaround. Harvard Business Review. 2004;82(10):114-21.

Tang C. S. A review of marketing-operations interface models: from co-existence to coordination and collaboration. International Journal of Production Economics. 2010;125(1):22-40.

Thomé A. M. T., Scavarda L. F., Fernandez N. S., Scavarda A. J. Sales and operations planning: a research synthesis. International Journal of Production Economics. 2012;138(1):1-13.

Thomé A. M. T., Scavarda L. F., Fernandez N. S., Scavarda A. J. Sales and operations planning and the firm performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. 2012;61(4):359-81.

Business intelligence meets business process management. 2006.

Vergara S. C. Projetos e relatórios de pesquisa em administração. 2006.

Viswanathan N. Sales and Operations Planning: integrate with finance and improve revenue. 2009.

Wallace T. F., Stahl R. A. The demand planning process in executive planning S&OP. Journal of Business Forecasting. 2008;27:19-24.

Wing L., Perry G. Toward twenty-first-century pharmaceutical sales and operations planning. Pharmaceutical Technology. 2001;25(1):20-5.

5defaddc0e88252c74b5f734 gp Articles
Links & Downloads

Gest. Prod.

Share this page
Page Sections