Investigação sobre a organização do trabalho para a inovação e transição tecnológica no setor elétrico brasileiro
Investigating work organization for innovation and technological transition in the Brazilian power sector
Guilherme Amaral; Roberto Marx; Mario Salerno
Resumo
Palavras-chave
Abstract
Abstract:: This article aims to characterize the organizational structure for innovation in electric utilities according the literature related to technological transition and work organization for innovation. Case studies showed that most companies have presented more suitable organizational structures to deal with established technological regimes. However, the growing demand of society for sustainable energy systems poses a great challenge to the power industry, as these require great efforts in R&D for radical technological innovation from the companies in the sector. It is argued that companies organized under adhocracy are better able to cope with the challenges of the transition towards sustainability imposed on the electricity sector.
Keywords
Referências
Agência Nacional de Energia Elétrica – ANEEL. (2015). Banco de informações de geração. Brasília. Recuperado em 23 de março de 2015, de http://www.aneel.gov.br/aplicacoes/capacidadebrasil/capacidadebrasil.cfm
Amaral, G. S. G. (2012). A pesquisa e desenvolvimento no setor elétrico brasileiro: uma investigação da política tecnológica para o setor com base na teoria evolucionária da mudança técnica (dissertação de mestrado). Programa de Pós-graduação em Engenharia de Produção, Escola Politécnica, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo.
Bhattacharya, S., Krishnan, V., & Mahajan, V. (1998). Managing new product definition in highly dynamic environments. Management Science, 44(11), 50-64.
Biazzo, S. (2009). Flexibility, structuration, and simultaneity in new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(3), 336-355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00662.x.
Bin, A., Vélez, M. A., Ferro, A. F. P., Salles-Filho, S., Mattos, C., & Da, P. (2015). Da inovação: desafios para o setor elétrico. Gestão & Produção, 22(3), 552-564. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0104-530X1294-14.
Boon, W., Moors, E., & Meijer, A. (2014). Exploring dynamics and strategies of niche protection. Research Policy, 43(4), 792-803. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.01.005.
Centro de Gestão e Estudos Estratégicos – CGEE. (2001). Diretrizes estratégicas para o Fundo Setorial de Energia Elétrica (pp. 209-244, Parcerias Estratégicas, Vol. 13). Brasília.
Christensen, C. (1997). The Innovator’s Dilemma: when new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston: Harvard Business Scholl Press.
Clark, K.B., & Wheelwright, S. C. (1993). Managing new product and process development. New York: Free Press.
Cooper, R., & Perspective, G. (2008). The stage-gate idea-to-launch process- update, what’s new, and nexgen system. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(3), 213-232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2008.00296.x.
Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building theories from case study. Research Academy of Management, 14(4), 532-550.
Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31(8-9), 1257-1274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8.
Geels, F. W. (2004). From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems. Research Policy, 33(6-7), 897-920. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.015.
Geels, F. W. (2010). Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective. Research Policy, 39(4), 495-510. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.022.
Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. W. (2007). Comment on ‘Techno therapy or nurtured niches?’ by Hommels et al. Research Policy, 36(7), 1100-1101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.07.004.
Gomes, L. A. V., Amaral, G. S. G., Sbragia, R., Salerno, M. S., & Freitas, S. L. (2011). Integration of managerial and sociological perspective of innovation: a framework to the development process of radical innovation product. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference for the international association of management of technology. Miami.
Gomes, L. A. V., & Salerno, M. S. (2010). Modelo integrado de processo de desenvolvimento de produto e de planejamento inicial de spin-offs acadêmicos. Gestão & Produção, 17(2), 245-255.
Hughes, P. T. (1989). The evolution of large technological systems. In W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes & T. P. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems: new directions in the sociology and history of technology. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Kemp, R. (1994). Technology and the transition to environmental sustainability: the problem of technological regime shifts. Futures, 26(10), 1023-1046. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(94)90071-X.
Lam, A. (2005). Organizational innovation. In J. Fagerberg & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation (pp. 115-147). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lopolito, A., Morone, P., & Taylor, R. (2013). Emerging innovation niches: an agent based model. Research Policy, 42(6-7), 1225-1238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.03.002.
Markard, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. (2012). Sustainability transitions: an emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy, 41(6), 955-967. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013.
Marx, R. (2011). Organização do trabalho para a inovação (1. ed.). São Paulo: Atlas.
Marx, R., Mello, A. M., & Salerno, M. S. (2012). Organizational structures to support innovation: how do companies decide? Revista de Administração e Inovação, 9, 5-20.
Mintzberg, H. (2003). Criando organizações eficazes (2. ed.). São Paulo: Atlas.
O’Connor, G. C. (1998). Market learning and radical innovation: a cross case comparison of eight radical innovation projects. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15(42), 151-166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1520151.
Organisation for Economic Development – OECD. (2010). Energy technology perspectives: scenarios & strategies to 2050. Paris.
Pompermayer, F. M., De Negri, F., & Cavalcante, L. R. (2011). Inovação tecnológica no setor elétrico brasileiro: uma avaliação do programa de P&D regulado pela ANEEL. Brasília: Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada.
Raven, R., & Geels, F. (2010). Socio-cognitive evolution in niche development: comparative analysis of biogas development in Denmark and the Netherlands (1973-2004). Research Policy, 30, 87-99.
Raven, R., Jolivet, E., Mourik, R. M., & Feenstra, Y. (2009). Managing societal acceptance in new energy projects: a toolbox method for project managers. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(7), 963-977. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2009.02.005
Salerno, M. S. (2004). Da rotinização à flexibilização: ensaio sobre o pensamento crítico brasileiro de organização do trabalho. Gestão & Produção, 11(1), 21-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104-530X2004000100003.
Salerno, M. S. (2009). Reconfigurable organisation to cope with unpredictable goals. International Journal of Production Economics, 122(1), 419-428. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.06.015.
Schot, J. W., & Geels, F. W. (2008). Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: theory, findings, research agenda and policy. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 20(5), 537-554. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09537320802292651.
Sushandoyo, D., & Magnusson, T. (2014). Strategic niche management from a business perspective: taking cleaner vehicle technologies from prototype to series production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 74, 17-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.02.059.
Tushman, M. L., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38(4), 8-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/41165852.
Worley, C., & Lawler, E. (2006). Designing organizations that are built to change. MIT Sloan Management Review, 48(1), 19-23.
Yin, R. K. (2005). Estudo de caso: planejamento e métodos (3. ed.). Porto Alegre: Bookman.
Zancul, E., Marx, R., & Metzker, A. (2006). Organização do trabalho no processo de desenvolvimento de produtos: a aplicação da engenharia simultânea em duas montadoras de veículos. Gestão & Produção, 13(1), 15-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104-530X2006000100003.
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
LinkedIn
Mendeley
StumbleUpon
CiteULike
Reddit
Email